Norman W. Kidwell v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Norman W. Kidwell v. United States

237 F.2d 208, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 54, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 1956

Docket12836

StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 208 (Norman W. Kidwell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norman W. Kidwell v. United States, 237 F.2d 208, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 54, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

237 F.2d 208

Norman W. KIDWELL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12836.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 27, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; James R. Kirkland, Judge.

Mr. Daniel I. Sherry, Washington, D. C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant.

Mr. E. Tillman Stirling, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., Lewis Carroll and Edward O. Fennell, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for unauthorized use of a vehicle, D.C.Code, § 22-2204. There is no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI