Norman v. Town of Cheektowaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norman v. Town of Cheektowaga

11 A.D.3d 991, 782 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11389

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 991 (Norman v. Town of Cheektowaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norman v. Town of Cheektowaga, 11 A.D.3d 991, 782 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the [992]*992Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered August 13, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed, and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs cause of action to recover health benefits accrued in 1981 when plaintiffs employment and benefits were terminated (see Schirmer v Town of Harrison, 294 AD2d 347 [2002]). Plaintiff commenced his action in August 2001, and thus it is time-barred. Consequently, we reverse the order, grant defendant’s motion, dismiss the complaint, and deny plaintiffs cross motion. Present—Pine, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the [992]*992Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered August 13, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed, and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs cause of action to recover health benefits accrued in 1981 when plaintiffs employment and benefits were terminated (see Schirmer v Town of Harrison, 294 AD2d 347 [2002]). Plaintiff commenced his action in August 2001, and thus it is time-barred. Consequently, we reverse the order, grant defendant’s motion, dismiss the complaint, and deny plaintiffs cross motion. Present—Pine, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 991, 782 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-town-of-cheektowaga-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack