Norman v. State

130 S.E. 225, 34 Ga. App. 515, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 368
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1925
Docket16779
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 225 (Norman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norman v. State, 130 S.E. 225, 34 Ga. App. 515, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. James L. Dowling, for plaintiff in error. Clifford E. Hay, soliciior-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 225, 34 Ga. App. 515, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-state-gactapp-1925.