Norman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Norman v. State

112 S.E. 293, 28 Ga. App. 561, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 691

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 1922

Docket13403

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 S.E. 293 (Norman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norman v. State, 112 S.E. 293, 28 Ga. App. 561, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 691 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. After correctly charging the jury the law in reference to the defendant’s statement at the trial, it was not error for the court to add: “remembering that it is not under oath nor subject to the penalties incident to a sworn witness.” Ryals v. State, 125 Ga. 266 (1) (54 S. E. 168), and citation-.

2. The remaining ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is without substantial merit.

3. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI