Norman v. State

918 S.W.2d 720, 324 Ark. 118, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 326 Ark. 210
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 1, 1996·No. CR 95-361·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel, George J. Stone, requests a continuance for filing appellant’s brief. Counsel’s reason is that his law license was suspended on March 8, 1996, because of a deficiency in continuing legal education hours. He states that he expects to cure the deficiency on March 29, 1996, and have his license reinstated shordy thereafter.

Counsel’s motion is granted for thirty days. The clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule after the thirty-day period has run. The court forwards this per curiam to the Professional Conduct Committee for its consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norman v. State, 918 S.W.2d 720, 324 Ark. 118, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 217 (Ark. 1996).

918 S.W.2d 720 (Norman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.