Norman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 16, 2002
DocketI.C. NOS. 811206, 814965 and 849719
StatusPublished

This text of Norman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Norman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Bost, along with the briefs and arguments on appeal. Accordingly, the Full Commission REVERSES in part and AFFIRMS in part the Deputy Commissioner's holding and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and the North Carolina Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.

2. The parties are subject to and bound by the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

3. R. J. Reynolds was a qualified self-insured employer, administered by Kemper Insurance under the terms and provisions of the Act.

4. The employee-employer relationship existed between the plaintiff and the defendant-employer at the time of the alleged injury.

5. The plaintiff's average weekly wage was $645.00 as of 4 March 1996 and $666.00 as of 7 May 1997.

6. The defendant-employer paid plaintiff $6,966 in salary continuation benefits for the alleged 4 March 1996 injury and $16,420 for the alleged 7 May 1997 injury and, beginning the week of 7 December 1997, defendant-employer paid plaintiff $359.93 per week continuing to the present in long term disability benefits.

The Pre-Trial Stipulations dated April 19, 1998 and May 13, 1999 submitted by the parties at the hearing are incorporated by reference.

In addition, the parties stipulated into evidence the following:

"Medical records concerning right arm" 24 pages

"Medical records concerning left arm" 12 pages

"Physical therapy records" 9 pages

"RJR Medical Records" Pages 1-11

"Winston-Salem Health Care Records 1984-87" Pages 12-20

"Winston-Salem Health Care Records 1990-97" Pages 21-67

"Proceedings leading to hearing in claim" 9 pages

and the following exhibits were offered into evidence by plaintiff:

Employment history (6/25/98) Ex. P-1

Job evaluations (6/25/98) Ex. P-2

Job description (6/25/98) Ex. P-3

Defendants' Answers to Interrogatories (6/25/98) Ex. P-5

Defendants' Answers to Second Interrogatories (6/25/98) Ex. P-6

Industrial Commission proceedings leading to May 13 hearing Ex. I

Additional medical records from Dr. O'Keeffe (5/13/99) and Ex. II

defendants offered the following exhibits into evidence:

Video of plaintiff's job (6/25/98) Ex. D-1

Surveillance video by Scott Pope Investigations (6/25/98) Ex. D-2

Resume of Alan C. Gorrod, Triad Therapy Services, Inc. (5/13/99) Ex. I-1

Ergonomic Job Analysis (5/13/99) Ex. I-2

***********
Based upon the evidence of record, the Full Commission enters the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff worked at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("Reynolds") as a General Plant Attendant since 1975 performing various jobs including forklift driver and general laborer. In March 1991, plaintiff was injured in a compensable accident while driving a forklift that resulted in a torn right rotator cuff requiring surgical repair. Plaintiff was given a 15% PPD rating to the right shoulder. Reynolds paid the PPD rating and plaintiff was released to return to work, albeit at a less strenuous job. Plaintiff returned to work in September 1991 as a General Plant Attendant, a position where he could limit his lifting to below the waist level and use his whole body to pull; this job change was pursuant to the recommendations of plaintiff's treating physician, Dr. Lowe.

2. Beginning in 1995, plaintiff worked as a General Plant Attendant on the Second Floor of the Product Reclamation Operations Facility ("PRO Facility"). Plaintiff's job at the PRO Facility consisted of removing paper from reclaimed tobacco moving across parallel bars and general cleaning. The specific job tasks included removing loose cigarette paper from a sieve, using fingers to pick up lengths of cigarette paper with one worker positioned on each side of a vibrating sieve. This task was performed on non-continuous basis with the employees rotating sides, and could be done by using either hand. Plaintiff also used a push broom intermittently and a compressed air hose with a wand extension to blow off residue tobacco film from machines. Cleaning the machines was done one to two times per week, one to two hours at a time, and was self-paced. Part of plaintiff's job was to move 4 foot by 4 foot deep "cans" or carts of loose cigarette packs to the auto dump of the agitator/sieve conveyor. This was performed intermittently when the cans became full. The cans, although weighing up to 700 pounds, were on wheels and moved easily across a level concrete floor, using total body force.

3. Beginning in December, 1996, plaintiff was instructed to clean his work area due to a recent bug infestation. The areas plaintiff was instructed to clean included areas above his head. Plaintiff repetitively had to use an air hose to complete this task.

Plaintiff suffered a recurrent right rotator cuff tear caused by this overhead work.

Plaintiff's work in reaching with an air hose repetitively to clean his work area put him at an increased risk as compared to the general public to suffer from recurrent right rotator cuff tear and bilateral rotator cuff tendonitis.

6. On 4 March 1996, plaintiff had to push tobacco cans weighing about 500 pounds out of his way in order to get to his work area. This was not part of his normal and usual work activity. As plaintiff was pushing one can out of the way, it accidentally hit another can and jerked plaintiff's left arm, causing severe pain, and a bulge or knot to form in his upper arm or biceps tendon area. This accident caused plaintiff to suffer a rupture or the long head of the biceps tendon.

7. Later on 4 March 1996, while plaintiff was working at the vibrating sieve, he mentioned to his supervisor, Rita Kilgore that he thought he might have hurt his left arm moving a can and showed her a knot in his left arm. Ms. Kilgore sent plaintiff to the RJR Medical Department where Dr. Bonfili, the Director of the Medical Department, examined him. Plaintiff told Dr. Bonfili that he noticed a tingling and swelling in his left upper arm while at work. Plaintiff was diagnosed with a ruptured left bicep and referred to Winston-Salem Health Care ("WSHC"), the HMO for Reynolds' employees, for treatment.

8. As a result of the 4 March 1996 compensable accident, plaintiff was unable to earn wages in the same or in any other employment during the period 4 March 1996 through 29 May 1996. His average weekly wage as of 4 March 1996 was $645.38, yielding a compensation rate of $430.27.

9. WSHC treated plaintiff conservatively and referred him to Dr. Tomberlin, an orthopedic surgeon, for a second opinion. Dr. Tomberlin felt that surgical repair would not likely be satisfactory, but recommended that plaintiff build the brahalsis muscle in his left arm to substitute for the strength and gave him instructions as how to do that.

10. Plaintiff was out of work from 6 March 1996 to 29 May 1996 due to the left arm injury. During that time period, he was compensated one hundred percent of his usual salary through a salary continuation ("SC") benefit provided by his employer. Plaintiff was not given a PPD rating or work restrictions from the injury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(6)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-42.1
North Carolina § 97-42.1
§ 97-53
North Carolina § 97-53(13)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Norman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-ncworkcompcom-2002.