Norman v. O'NEIL'S MARKETS, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Norman v. O'NEIL'S MARKETS, INC.

241 S.W.3d 421, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2007 WL 4392919

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2007

DocketED 89699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 S.W.3d 421 (Norman v. O'NEIL'S MARKETS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norman v. O'NEIL'S MARKETS, INC., 241 S.W.3d 421, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2007 WL 4392919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Doretha Norman appeals the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying Norman unemployment benefits because her termination resulted from misconduct in violation of a *422 known and reasonable company rule. Sections 288.030(23) and 288.050.2 RSMo. (2000).

Norman argues that her conduct, including talking on her mobile phone during work while ignoring customers, did not constitute misconduct under the statute. She additionally argues that the Commission made decisions based on inadmissible hearsay and thus the decision was not based on competent and substantial evidence.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we find that the Commission’s order was supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. We believe that an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI