Norman v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.
This text of 415 S.E.2d 293 (Norman v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee-plaintiff brought suit, seeking damages based upon allegations that appellant-defendant had breached a covenant not to compete. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict “in the amount of $0” was returned. It is from the judgment entered on this verdict that appellant appeals.
Appellant does not have standing to appeal because “ ‘[t]he jury verdict for zero damages . . . was a judgment for [appellant]. (Cit.)’ [Cit.]” (Emphasis supplied.) Gielow v. Strickland, 185 Ga. App. 85, 87 (4) (363 SE2d 278) (1987). See also Benton v. Wesley Machinery, 191 Ga. App. 334, 335 (1) (381 SE2d 577) (1989). “ ‘(S)ince no damages were assessed against [appellant] he was absolved from any liability in the case. (Cits.)’ [Cit.]” Palmer v. Barnes, 193 Ga. App. 105 (387 SE2d 44) (1989). “ ‘ “A party not aggrieved by the judgment of the trial court is without legal right to except thereto, since he has no just cause of complaint.” (Cit.)’ [Cit.] The appeal is accordingly dismissed. [Cit.]” Morgan v. Miller, 191 Ga. App. 803, 804 (383 SE2d 183) (1989).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 S.E.2d 293, 202 Ga. App. 732, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-nationwide-credit-inc-gactapp-1992.