Norman v. Kilgore

120 F. 1020, 56 C.C.A. 683, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1903
DocketNo. 1,196
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 F. 1020 (Norman v. Kilgore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norman v. Kilgore, 120 F. 1020, 56 C.C.A. 683, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4576 (5th Cir. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The bill shows an equity on the part of the complainant Kilgore, and the circuit court had jurisdiction to grant the injunction. [1021]*1021pendente lite. Whether the injunction as granted was in all respects proper depends on the facts, which can only be established contradictorily, and we cannot fairly pass upon the matter at this time on the record as presented -on this appeal. As the appellants are permitted to bond the injunction in the court below, no irreparable injury can result from remitting the questions raised on this appeal to final decree. See Carson v. Combe, 29 C. C. A. 660, 86 Fed. 202. The decree appealed from is affirmed. See 119 Fed. 1006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
274 U.S. 684 (Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 F. 1020, 56 C.C.A. 683, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-kilgore-ca5-1903.