Norman v. Elrod

394 N.E.2d 1043, 76 Ill. 2d 426, 31 Ill. Dec. 725, 1979 Ill. LEXIS 333
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 1979·No. 51521·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he was incorrectly advised at the time of his plea of guilty that there would be no mandatory parole term following the expiration of his sentence. No claim is made that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter or over defendant’s person, and habeas corpus is not available. (Hughes v. Kiley (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 261; Long v. Israel (1977), 56 Ill. App. 3d 14.) The motion by petitioner for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus is denied, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to file a post-conviction petition in the trial court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norman v. Elrod, 394 N.E.2d 1043, 76 Ill. 2d 426, 31 Ill. Dec. 725, 1979 Ill. LEXIS 333 (Ill. 1979).

394 N.E.2d 1043 (Norman v. Elrod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Robinson
432 N.E.2d 313 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1982)
United States Ex Rel. Williams v. Morris
483 F. Supp. 775 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)