Norman v. Craig
This text of Norman v. Craig (Norman v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6162
TIMOTHY G. NORMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ELEXIA CRAIG; RASHAD ROYSTER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROUMMEL; SERGEANT THOMAS JOYNER; DENNIS ROWLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-ct-03128-H)
Submitted: April 22, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy G. Norman, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Oliver Gray Wheeler, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Timothy G. Norman appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Norman’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Norman v. Craig, No. 5:07-ct-03128-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Norman v. Craig, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-v-craig-ca4-2009.