Norman Miller v. Michael J. Astrue
This text of 334 F. App'x 47 (Norman Miller v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Norman L. Miller appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB). Upon careful review of the record, see PateFires v. Astrue, 564 F.3d 935, 942 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, see Pyland v. Apfel, 149 F.3d 873, 876 (8th Cir.1998) (to qualify for DIB, claimant must establish disability predating expiration of his insured status). We decline to consider issues Miller did not raise during the administrative process or in the district court. See Steahr v. Apfel, 151 F.3d 1124, 1126 (8th Cir.1998). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-miller-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2009.