Norman Miller v. Michael J. Astrue

334 F. App'x 47
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2009
Docket08-2624
StatusUnpublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 47 (Norman Miller v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norman Miller v. Michael J. Astrue, 334 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman L. Miller appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB). Upon careful review of the record, see PateFires v. Astrue, 564 F.3d 935, 942 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, see Pyland v. Apfel, 149 F.3d 873, 876 (8th Cir.1998) (to qualify for DIB, claimant must establish disability predating expiration of his insured status). We decline to consider issues Miller did not raise during the administrative process or in the district court. See Steahr v. Apfel, 151 F.3d 1124, 1126 (8th Cir.1998). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 F. App'x 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-miller-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2009.