Norman Gradsky v. United States
This text of 482 F.2d 1379 (Norman Gradsky v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is hereby ordered that this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction since the judgment sought to be appealed is not final as to all of the appellant’s claims. 1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P.; Graham v. Cole, 5th Cir. 1973, 483 F.2d 255; Jones v. Riggsby, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 760; United States v. Crow et al., 5th Cir. 1973, 474 F.2d 200.
Dismissed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(e)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
482 F.2d 1379, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-gradsky-v-united-states-ca5-1973.