Norman Dustin Reedy v. State
This text of Norman Dustin Reedy v. State (Norman Dustin Reedy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NORMAN DUSTIN REEDY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Norman Dustin Reedy, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated assault. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On December 17, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.
On December 30, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered
and filed this the 15th day of January, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Norman Dustin Reedy v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-dustin-reedy-v-state-texapp-2009.