Norman Babers v. State
This text of Norman Babers v. State (Norman Babers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
NORMAN BABERS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-3541
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed April 20, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Don F. Briggs, Judge.
Norman Babers, Wewahitchka, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Norman Babers appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief
filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Babers alleges a violation of
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), as well as two pieces of newly discovered
evidence. We affirm regarding the claims of newly discovered evidence without further
discussion. As to Babers’s Brady argument, we remand for the trial court to attach to its
order portions of the record conclusively refuting the claim or for an evidentiary hearing.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
SAWAYA, PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Norman Babers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-babers-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.