Norman Allen Ayers v. William Smith Tyrone Haines, Deceased

Fourth Circuit

Norman Allen Ayers v. William Smith Tyrone Haines, Deceased

45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40365, 1994 WL 709648

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 1994

Docket94-7137

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 425 (Norman Allen Ayers v. William Smith Tyrone Haines, Deceased) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norman Allen Ayers v. William Smith Tyrone Haines, Deceased, 45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40365, 1994 WL 709648 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Norman Allen AYERS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
William SMITH; Tyrone Haines, Deceased, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-7137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 1994
Decided: December 22, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-2234-MJG)

Norman Allen Ayers, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ayers v. Smith, No. CA-94-2234-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Norman Allen AYERS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
William SMITH; Tyrone Haines, Deceased, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-7137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 1994
Decided: December 22, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-2234-MJG)

Norman Allen Ayers, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ayers v. Smith, No. CA-94-2234-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 425, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40365, 1994 WL 709648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norman-allen-ayers-v-william-smith-tyrone-haines-d-ca4-1994.