Norma Wingate v. Megan J. Brennan

648 F. App'x 737

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: April 19, 2016
• Docket: 13-17266
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ****

Norma J. Wingate appeals pro se from the district court’s order in her employment action alleging discrimination in violation of Title VIL We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Wingate’s Title VII discrimination claims because Wingate failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the alleged conduct was due to any of her protected classes. See id. at 341-42 (though' pro se pleadings are liberally construed, plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim); Leong v. Potter, 347 F.3d 1117, 1124 (9th Cir.2003) (elements of Title VII employment discrimination claim).

AFFIRMED.

**** xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.