Norma Martin v. E.C. Publications Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: November 3, 2023
• Docket: 22-13408
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-13408 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

NORMA MARTIN, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, versus E.C. PUBLICATIONS INC., WARNER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, d.b.a. DC Comics

Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees,

DC COMICS, Inc., USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 22-13408

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-21167-DPG ____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We issued a jurisdictional question asking whether the dis- trict court has entered a final, appealable order, and, particularly, whether Appellees’ counterclaims have been resolved. In re- sponse, Appellees request that we remand this appeal to the district court for a ruling on their pending motion to dismiss the counter- claims. Appellant Norma Martin opposes the motion. We con- clude that the district court has not entered a final or appealable order, so this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and Ap- pellees’ motion to remand is DENIED as MOOT. Martin appeals the district court’s September 27, 2022 order entering summary judgment to Appellees on all of her claims. However, the district court’s order did not address Appellees’ counterclaims, and our review of the record does not reveal any other order disposing of them. Further, the district court did not certify its September 27, 2022 order for immediate review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Accordingly, the district USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 3 of 3

22-13408 Opinion of the Court 3

court’s order is not final or immediately appealable, and we lack jurisdiction to review it. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we decline to entertain Appellees’ motion to remand. See Vachon v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co., 20 F.4th 1343, 1347 (11th Cir. 2021) (stating that when we lack jurisdiction, “we may do no more than ‘an- nounc[e] the fact and dismiss[] the cause’” (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 916 F.3d 967, 971 (11th Cir. 2019))).