Norma Garza v. San Antonio Water System

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 2, 2013
Docket04-13-00051-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Norma Garza v. San Antonio Water System (Norma Garza v. San Antonio Water System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norma Garza v. San Antonio Water System, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 02, 2013

No. 04-13-00051-CV

Norma GARZA, Appellant

v.

SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CI-12912 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this appeal, appellant appeals a judgment signed September 21, 2012. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial or any other documents that would extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due October 21, 2013, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later on November 5, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. The record contains a notice of appeal file stamped November 6, 2013, and attached to the notice of appeal is a certificate of service stating the notice of appeal was filed on November 6, 2012. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.

Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely even under the mailing rule set forth in rule 9.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b); Lofton v. Allstate Ins. Co., 895 S.W.2d 693 (Tex. 1995). Moreover, we cannot imply a motion for extension of time because appellant did not file the notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period provided by rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 615 (Tex. 1997).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file, on or before April 12, 2013, a response establishing that the notice of appeal was timely filed. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). If a supplemental clerk’s record is required, appellant must ask the district clerk to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of this court. FILE COPY

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and all counsel.

____________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of April, 2013.

____________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Lofton v. Allstate Insurance Co.
895 S.W.2d 693 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Norma Garza v. San Antonio Water System, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norma-garza-v-san-antonio-water-system-texapp-2013.