Norkus v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.
This text of 153 N.Y.S. 935 (Norkus v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By section 432, subd. 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure, service is authorized upon a resident director, where the defendant, a foreign corporation, has property within this state. The person served was a' resident director, and from the record it appears that the defendant corporation has property within this state. The service upon the defendant in this manner is therefore authorized by the Code, and for that reason the motion to set aside the service of the summons was properly denied.
The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 N.Y.S. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norkus-v-pittsburgh-coal-co-nyappdiv-1915.