Norille v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Norille v. State

131 Ala. 35

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 131 Ala. 35 (Norille v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norille v. State, 131 Ala. 35 (Ala. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

McCLELLAN, C. J.-

This case was tried by the judge without a jury. It is sought by thisi appeal only ¡to have his finding and conclusion of guilt on the testimony reviewed. The facts were not agreed upon, nor was there any special finding of them nor request for such finding. On this state of case the conclusion of the judge stands as a verdict of a jury, and cannot be revised by this court. — Bell v. State, 75 Ala. 25; Knowles v. State, 80 Ala. 9; Wright v. State, 29 So. Rep. 864; Fiebelman v. State, 130 Ala. 122.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCLELLAN, C. J.-

This case was tried by the judge without a jury. It is sought by thisi appeal only ¡to have his finding and conclusion of guilt on the testimony reviewed. The facts were not agreed upon, nor was there any special finding of them nor request for such finding. On this state of case the conclusion of the judge stands as a verdict of a jury, and cannot be revised by this court. — Bell v. State, 75 Ala. 25; Knowles v. State, 80 Ala. 9; Wright v. State, 29 So. Rep. 864; Fiebelman v. State, 130 Ala. 122.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 Ala. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norille-v-state-ala-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack