NORGREN v. Aramark
759 N.W.2d 892, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 261499
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NORGREN v. Aramark, 759 N.W.2d 892, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 261499 (Mich. 2009).
759 N.W.2d 892 (NORGREN v. Aramark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)