NORGREN v. Aramark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

NORGREN v. Aramark

759 N.W.2d 892, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 261499

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 28, 2009

DocketA08-1822

StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.W.2d 892 (NORGREN v. Aramark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NORGREN v. Aramark, 759 N.W.2d 892, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 261499 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI