Norful v. State
489 S.W.2d 239, 253 Ark. 841, 1973 Ark. LEXIS 1668
This text of 489 S.W.2d 239 (Norful v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Norful v. State, 489 S.W.2d 239, 253 Ark. 841, 1973 Ark. LEXIS 1668 (Ark. 1973).
Opinion
Appellants Bobby Earl Norful and Samuel Edward Norful contend that their robbery conviction should be set aside because of lack of identification. There is no merit to this contention. The record shows eye witness identification, possession of the fruits of the crime within minutes after the robbery, and a signed confession by both appellants.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
489 S.W.2d 239, 253 Ark. 841, 1973 Ark. LEXIS 1668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norful-v-state-ark-1973.