Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers

537 U.S. 807, 123 S. Ct. 57, 154 L. Ed. 2d 9, 71 U.S.L.W. 3233, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 5441
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers. Read the opinion of the Court — 538 U.S. 135
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 2002·No. 01-963·Published

Opinion

Cir. Ct. Kanawha County, W. Va. [Certiorari granted, 535 U. S. 969.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of the Solicitor General to permit David B. Salmons to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers, 537 U.S. 807, 123 S. Ct. 57, 154 L. Ed. 2d 9, 71 U.S.L.W. 3233, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 5441 (2002).

537 U.S. 807 (Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.