Norfolk v. State
This text of 570 S.W.3d 201 (Norfolk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elton Norfolk appeals from the motion court's Judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.0351 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's factual findings and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
570 S.W.3d 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norfolk-v-state-moctapp-2019.