Norfolk Beet Sugar Co. v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Norfolk Beet Sugar Co. v. State

102 N.W. 83, 73 Neb. 69, 1905 Neb. LEXIS 26

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 5, 1905

DocketNo. 13,996

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.W. 83 (Norfolk Beet Sugar Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norfolk Beet Sugar Co. v. State, 102 N.W. 83, 73 Neb. 69, 1905 Neb. LEXIS 26 (Neb. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Oldham, C.

This is a companion case with Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, ante, p. 57, alleging a claim for bounty under the same act. The petitions are similar, and a demurrer was sustained by the court below in each. In this court the cases were argued together; consequent, for the reasons stated in Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, supra, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

[70]*70By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oldham, C.

This is a companion case with Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, ante, p. 57, alleging a claim for bounty under the same act. The petitions are similar, and a demurrer was sustained by the court below in each. In this court the cases were argued together; consequent, for the reasons stated in Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. State, supra, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

[70]*70By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.W. 83, 73 Neb. 69, 1905 Neb. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norfolk-beet-sugar-co-v-state-neb-1905.