Norfleet v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Norfleet v. United States

35 F. App'x 59

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 2002

Docket02-1152

StatusUnpublished

This text of 35 F. App'x 59 (Norfleet v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norfleet v. United States, 35 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition to quash administrative summonses issued to third parties by the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Norfleet v. United States, No. MISC-01-28-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition to quash administrative summonses issued to third parties by the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Norfleet v. United States, No. MISC-01-28-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 F. App'x 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norfleet-v-united-states-ca4-2002.