Noren v. Topilow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Noren v. Topilow

27 A.D.2d 546, 276 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 A.D.2d 546 (Noren v. Topilow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noren v. Topilow, 27 A.D.2d 546, 276 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 1, 1966, dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon appellant submits a further appendix, including therein all papers upon which the general preference was originally granted (E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N Y 2d 51). Appeal, insofar as it relates to the court’s “order” (actually a decision during trial) granting defendant’s oral motion for a mistrial, dismissed,, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision or ruling at trial and in any event, as indicated, no order was made. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 1, 1966, dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon appellant submits a further appendix, including therein all papers upon which the general preference was originally granted (E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N Y 2d 51). Appeal, insofar as it relates to the court’s “order” (actually a decision during trial) granting defendant’s oral motion for a mistrial, dismissed,, without costs. No appeal lies from a decision or ruling at trial and in any event, as indicated, no order was made. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 546, 276 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noren-v-topilow-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack