Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter

269 A.D. 754, 54 N.Y.S.2d 474

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Sidney Putter from that part of an order, entered on reargument, which denied as to him a motion made by defendants to vacate a money judgment theretofore rendered against them in the Justice’s Court of the Town of Hempstead, County of Nassau. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court was without power to entertain the application. (Daniels v. Southard, 36 App. Div. 540; Johnson v. Manning, 75 App. Div. 285; Garges Bros., Inc., v. Specht, 241 App. Div. 737; Quackenbush v. Johnston, 249 App. Div. 452.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant Sidney Putter from that part of an order, entered on reargument, which denied as to him a motion made by defendants to vacate a money judgment theretofore rendered against them in the Justice’s Court of the Town of Hempstead, County of Nassau. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court was without power to entertain the application. (Daniels v. Southard, 36 App. Div. 540; Johnson v. Manning, 75 App. Div. 285; Garges Bros., Inc., v. Specht, 241 App. Div. 737; Quackenbush v. Johnston, 249 App. Div. 452.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter, 269 A.D. 754, 54 N.Y.S.2d 474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 754 (Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related