Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter
This text of 269 A.D. 754 (Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant Sidney Putter from that part of an order, entered on reargument, which denied as to him a motion made by defendants to vacate a money judgment theretofore rendered against them in the Justice’s Court of the Town of Hempstead, County of Nassau. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court was without power to entertain the application. (Daniels v. Southard, 36 App. Div. 540; Johnson v. Manning, 75 App. Div. 285; Garges Bros., Inc., v. Specht, 241 App. Div. 737; Quackenbush v. Johnston, 249 App. Div. 452.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 754, 54 N.Y.S.2d 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norell-holding-corp-v-putter-nyappdiv-1945.