Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter
This text of Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter (Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1630
FRANCISCO NOREIGA-QUIJANO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:07-cv-00204-FL)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francisco Noreiga-Quijano, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Lora M. Taylor-Tripp, Assistant United States Attorneys, Kelly Michele Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Francisco Noreiga-Quijano appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint alleging employment
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter, No. 5:07-cv-
00204-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noreiga-quijano-v-potter-ca4-2009.