Noreck v. Fronczak

New York Court of Appeals

Noreck v. Fronczak

61 N.E.2d 748, 294 N.Y. 751, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 949

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 N.E.2d 748 (Noreck v. Fronczak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noreck v. Fronczak, 61 N.E.2d 748, 294 N.Y. 751, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in all courts to the appellants to abide the event. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that at the time of the injuries, the infant plaintiff was invited upon the defendants’ property, and that the defendants failed in their duty to exercise reasonable care to maintain the place in a safe condition for her use. No opinion.

Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran and Thacher, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in all courts to the appellants to abide the event. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that at the time of the injuries, the infant plaintiff was invited upon the defendants’ property, and that the defendants failed in their duty to exercise reasonable care to maintain the place in a safe condition for her use. No opinion.

Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran and Thacher, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.E.2d 748, 294 N.Y. 751, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noreck-v-fronczak-ny-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack