Noreck v. Fronczak
61 N.E.2d 748, 294 N.Y. 751, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 949
Opinion
Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in all courts to the appellants to abide the event. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that at the time of the injuries, the infant plaintiff was invited upon the defendants’ property, and that the defendants failed in their duty to exercise reasonable care to maintain the place in a safe condition for her use. No opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Dye, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran and Thacher, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Noreck v. Fronczak, 61 N.E.2d 748, 294 N.Y. 751, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1945).
61 N.E.2d 748 (Noreck v. Fronczak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Koppel v. Hebrew Academy of Five Towns
191 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Haddock v. City of New York
140 A.D.2d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Mendez v. Goroff
13 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
May v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 1
68 N.E.2d 44 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)