Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter

181 U.S. 615, 21 S. Ct. 923, 45 L. Ed. 1029, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1400
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 13, 1901
DocketNo. 388
StatusPublished

This text of 181 U.S. 615 (Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter, 181 U.S. 615, 21 S. Ct. 923, 45 L. Ed. 1029, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1400 (1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed with costs on the author[616]*616ity qí Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; Kohl v. Lehlback, 160 U. S. 293, and see State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403; Nordstrom v. Moyer, Sheriff, 170 U. S. 703; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124; State v. Nordstrom, 7 Wash. 506.

Mr. Walter S. Fulton and Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaite for the motions. Mr. James Hamilton Lewis opposing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kohl v. Lehlback
160 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Craemer v. Washington
168 U.S. 124 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Nobles v. Georgia
168 U.S. 398 (Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Nordstrom
53 L.R.A. 584 (Washington Supreme Court, 1899)
State v. Nordstrom
35 P. 382 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 U.S. 615, 21 S. Ct. 923, 45 L. Ed. 1029, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nordstrom-ex-rel-denning-v-van-de-vanter-scotus-1901.