Home/Supreme Court/Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter

Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter

181 U.S. 615, 21 S. Ct. 923, 45 L. Ed. 1029, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1400
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1901·No. No. 388·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed with costs on the author[616]*616ity qí Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; Kohl v. Lehlback, 160 U. S. 293, and see State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403; Nordstrom v. Moyer, Sheriff, 170 U. S. 703; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124; State v. Nordstrom, 7 Wash. 506.

Mr. Walter S. Fulton and Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaite for the motions. Mr. James Hamilton Lewis opposing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter, 181 U.S. 615, 21 S. Ct. 923, 45 L. Ed. 1029, 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1400 (1901).

181 U.S. 615 (Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kohl v. Lehlback
160 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Craemer v. Washington
168 U.S. 124 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Nobles v. Georgia
168 U.S. 398 (Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Nordstrom
53 L.R.A. 584 (Washington Supreme Court, 1899)
State v. Nordstrom
35 P. 382 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)