Nordmark v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nordmark v. Clark

16 A.D.2d 668, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 668 (Nordmark v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nordmark v. Clark, 16 A.D.2d 668, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Clark appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 1958, which denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue his prior motion to vacate a default judgment of foreclosure and the Referee’s deed thereunder, on the ground that he was never served with process. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of holding a hearing on the question of service of process upon said defendant Clark, and for the purpose of making a determination on the basis of the whole record, including particularly the evidence adduced at such hearing (Dege v. Mascot Realty Corp., 243 App. Div. 546). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant Clark appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 21, 1958, which denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue his prior motion to vacate a default judgment of foreclosure and the Referee’s deed thereunder, on the ground that he was never served with process. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion remitted to the Special Term for the purpose of holding a hearing on the question of service of process upon said defendant Clark, and for the purpose of making a determination on the basis of the whole record, including particularly the evidence adduced at such hearing (Dege v. Mascot Realty Corp., 243 App. Div. 546). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 668, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nordmark-v-clark-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack