Nordlinger v. The Connaught

32 F. 640, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedNovember 9, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 F. 640 (Nordlinger v. The Connaught) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nordlinger v. The Connaught, 32 F. 640, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106 (E.D.N.Y. 1887).

Opinion

Benedict, J.

The evidence in this case as to the character of the voyage of the ship in which the libelant’s prunes were transported, and the weak character of the casks in which the prunes were contained, is abundantly sufficient to cast upon the libelant the burden of showing bad stowage. This burden has not been discharged. The libelant, instead of proving bad stowage, has offered testimony to show that the casks were good, and asks the court to infer bad stowage. This cannot be inferred from the facts proved here. On the contrary, from the evidence as to the character of the casks, the natural inference is that the character of the casks caused the damage to the prunes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Schickshinny
45 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Georgia, 1942)
Johnson v. S. S. Schickshinny
45 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Georgia, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F. 640, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nordlinger-v-the-connaught-nyed-1887.