Nordlinger v. Levine

18 N.Y.S. 953, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 52
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided March 7, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The application is too late. By the settled practice of the ■court a motion for a reargument will not be entertained unless presented, at ■furthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided. Independently, however, of this formal objection, the motion is without merit. Reargument denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nordlinger v. Levine, 18 N.Y.S. 953, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 52 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

18 N.Y.S. 953 (Nordlinger v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.