Nordling v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nordling v. City of New York

278 A.D. 561, 102 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3910

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 1951·Published

Opinion

The order appealed from granting claimant-respondent’s motion to file notice of claim against the City of New York after the expiration of the statutory period unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. (See Matter of Martin v. School Bd. [Long Beach], 301 N. Y. 233, 238, 239, and Matter of Moore v. City of New York, 302 N. Y. 563.) Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order appealed from granting claimant-respondent’s motion to file notice of claim against the City of New York after the expiration of the statutory period unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. (See Matter of Martin v. School Bd. [Long Beach], 301 N. Y. 233, 238, 239, and Matter of Moore v. City of New York, 302 N. Y. 563.) Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Nordling v. City of New York, 278 A.D. 561, 102 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

278 A.D. 561 (Nordling v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related