Nordheim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nordheim v. State

200 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1967

DocketNo. 1-447

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 2d 825 (Nordheim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nordheim v. State, 200 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has appealed from the denial of a motion he filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, ch. 924, F.S.A. Appendix.

In his motion he asserted that he did not ' have the assistance of counsel at the critical stages of his prosecution. The record in this cause affirmatively shows that counsel was appointed for this appellant and that his counsel was present both at his arraignment where he entered a plea of guilty and at his sentencing. Further, the record on appeal contains two letters written by the appellant in which he names as his attorney at his trial the attorney that the record shows was appointed by the court to represent appellant.

In addition, appellant has previously filed another Rule 1 motion in which he contended that he was not afforded counsel during his trial proceedings. This prior motion was denied and appellant failed to take an appeal therefrom. He now attempts to raise the same question in his motion which is the subject of this appeal.

We find no error in the denial of the motion and hereby affirm the order appealed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has appealed from the denial of a motion he filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, ch. 924, F.S.A. Appendix.

In his motion he asserted that he did not ' have the assistance of counsel at the critical stages of his prosecution. The record in this cause affirmatively shows that counsel was appointed for this appellant and that his counsel was present both at his arraignment where he entered a plea of guilty and at his sentencing. Further, the record on appeal contains two letters written by the appellant in which he names as his attorney at his trial the attorney that the record shows was appointed by the court to represent appellant.

In addition, appellant has previously filed another Rule 1 motion in which he contended that he was not afforded counsel during his trial proceedings. This prior motion was denied and appellant failed to take an appeal therefrom. He now attempts to raise the same question in his motion which is the subject of this appeal.

We find no error in the denial of the motion and hereby affirm the order appealed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nordheim-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.