Norcrest China Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2816
United States Customs Court·Decided March 6, 1968·No. No. P68/121; protests 63/3462 and 63/3465 (Portland, Oreg.)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484); that the items of merchandise marked “S” consist of cups and saucers which are not, in fact, chiefly used as tableware, but are chiefly used as souvenir articles; and that the items marked “D” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norcrest China Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1012, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2816 (cusc 1968).

60 Cust. Ct. 1012 (Norcrest China Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. Kay Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 130 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)