Norbury v. City of Buffalo
217 A.D. 786
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1926
StatusPublished
This text of 217 A.D. 786 (Norbury v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Norbury v. City of Buffalo, 217 A.D. 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; All concur, except Hubbs, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts on the authority of Kuhn v. Village of East Syracuse (209 App. Div. 186). Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kuhn v. Village of East Syracuse
209 A.D. 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
217 A.D. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norbury-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1926.