Norbury v. City of Buffalo

217 A.D. 785

Opinion

— -Judgment [786]*786and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hubbs, P. J., and Crouch, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts on the authority of Kuhn v. Village of East Syracuse (209 App. Div. 186). Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norbury v. City of Buffalo, 217 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

217 A.D. 785 (Norbury v. City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuhn v. Village of East Syracuse
209 A.D. 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)