Nora M. Reynosa v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 12, 2010
Docket04-10-00168-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Nora M. Reynosa v. State (Nora M. Reynosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nora M. Reynosa v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00168-CR

Nora M. REYNOSA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-11839W Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 12, 2010

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant, Nora Reynosa, pled guilty to aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon. On January 21, 2010, the trial court imposed sentence and signed a

certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed a notice of appeal, the 04-10-00168-CR

court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX . R. APP . P.

25.2(e).

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in which she asserts “the substance of the appeal was

raised in a written motion ruled on before trial.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain

agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State

and agreed to by the appellant. The clerk’s record does not contain any orders ruling on pre-trial

motions. Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R.

APP . P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on March 16, 2010, this court issued an order stating this appeal

would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows

appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110

S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial

court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nora M. Reynosa v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nora-m-reynosa-v-state-texapp-2010.