Nora Espinosa v. David Davila

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
Docket13-04-00117-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Nora Espinosa v. David Davila (Nora Espinosa v. David Davila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nora Espinosa v. David Davila, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-117-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________


NORA ESPINOSA,                                                             Appellant,


v.


DAVID DAVILA,                                                                Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, NORA ESPINOSA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-1921-F. The clerk’s record was filed on March 30, 2004. The reporter’s record was filed on March 29, 2004. Appellant’s brief was due on May 28, 2004. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

         When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

         On June 7, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 22nd day of July, 2004



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nora Espinosa v. David Davila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nora-espinosa-v-david-davila-texapp-2004.