Nooney v. Nooney Co.
948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 1997 WL 420326
Opinion
ORDER
The Nooney Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of its former officer, John Nooney, indemnifying him pursuant to an agreement for expenses he incurred on behalf of the company. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nooney v. Nooney Co., 948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 1997 WL 420326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
948 S.W.2d 725 (Nooney v. Nooney Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nooney v. Nationsbank, N.A.
996 S.W.2d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)