Nooney v. Nooney Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nooney v. Nooney Co.

948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 1997 WL 420326

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 29, 1997

DocketNo. 70783

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 948 S.W.2d 725 (Nooney v. Nooney Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nooney v. Nooney Co., 948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 1997 WL 420326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Nooney Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of its former officer, John Nooney, indemnifying him pursuant to an agreement for expenses he incurred on behalf of the company. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Nooney Company appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of its former officer, John Nooney, indemnifying him pursuant to an agreement for expenses he incurred on behalf of the company. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 S.W.2d 725, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 1997 WL 420326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nooney-v-nooney-co-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack