Noone v. New England

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

June 8, 1995

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 94-1988



                            MARION FARRELL NOONE, ET AL.,

                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,



                                          v.



                            NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.


____________________



        No. 94-2130



                            MARION FARRELL NOONE, ET AL.,

                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,



                                          v.



                            NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________


APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                 [Hon. Walter J. Skinner, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________



                                _____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________



                                 ____________________


Marion Farrell Noone and Joseph F. Noone, III on brief pro se.
            ____________________     ____________________

            Donald K.  Stern, United States  Attorney, and  Susan G.  Winkler,
            ________________                                _________________

        Assistant United States  Attorney, on brief  for defendants/appellees,

        Pat  Hynes,  Paul  Desmond,  Martin  Marciniak,  Mark  Mahar,  Kenneth



Varriale, Paul Flynn, and Thomas Lyster.

            John  V. Woodard and  Powers &  Hall Professional  Corporation, on
            ________________      ________________________________________

        brief for defendants/appellees Middleburgh Telephone  Company, Randall

        F. Becker and Barbara Becker.

            Pamela  A.  Smith  on  brief  for  defendants/appellees, New  York
            _________________

        Telephone Company, Richard A. Jalkut and Daniel J. Murphy.

            Pamela A.  Smith on  brief for  defendants/appellees, New  England
            ________________

        Telephone and Telegraph  Company, Paul O'Brien,  Robert Jacobs,  Nancy

        Kinton and William McManus.

            Philip J. Callan, Jr, Michael K.  Callan, Kevin M. Walkowski,  and
            ____________________  __________________  __________________

        Doherty,   Wallace,   Pillsbury  &   Murphy,   P.C.,   on  brief   for
        ___________________________________________________

        defendants/appellees,  James  Collins,  Harry  Miles   and  Growhoski,

        Callahan & Miles. 


____________________



                                 ____________________



Per Curiam.   We have reviewed  the parties' briefs  and
                 __________



            the  record on appeal.  We deny appellants' motions to strike



            the briefs  of the federal  defendants-appellees, New England



            Telephone Company, and New York Telephone Company.



                 We  affirm essentially  for  the reasons  stated in  the



            district  court's memoranda  and orders,  dated February  23,



            1994, June 8, 1994, and October 20, 1994.



                 Affirmed.
                 _________


-3-