Noonan v. Strahan

The Superior Court of New York City

Noonan v. Strahan

22 Jones & S. 551, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 122

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 23, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

“.....There was no error in so excluding this evidence. It did not prove, nor did it tend to prove, that the appellant had not made the statement which it was alleged that he had made. The record fails to show an exception that constitutes a ground for reversal, and the verdict cannot be held to be against evidence or the weight of evidence.”

T. Allison and D. J. Dean, for appellant. L. Lajlin Kellogg, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

“.....There was no error in so excluding this evidence. It did not prove, nor did it tend to prove, that the appellant had not made the statement which it was alleged that he had made. The record fails to show an exception that constitutes a ground for reversal, and the verdict cannot be held to be against evidence or the weight of evidence.”

T. Allison and D. J. Dean, for appellant. L. Lajlin Kellogg, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Noonan v. Strahan, 22 Jones & S. 551, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 122 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

22 Jones & S. 551 (Noonan v. Strahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.