Noonan v. Strahan

The Superior Court of New York City

Noonan v. Strahan

22 Jones & S. 551, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 122

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJune 23, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Jones & S. 551 (Noonan v. Strahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noonan v. Strahan, 22 Jones & S. 551, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 122 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

“.....There was no error in so excluding this evidence. It did not prove, nor did it tend to prove, that the appellant had not made the statement which it was alleged that he had made. The record fails to show an exception that constitutes a ground for reversal, and the verdict cannot be held to be against evidence or the weight of evidence.”

T. Allison and D. J. Dean, for appellant. L. Lajlin Kellogg, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

“.....There was no error in so excluding this evidence. It did not prove, nor did it tend to prove, that the appellant had not made the statement which it was alleged that he had made. The record fails to show an exception that constitutes a ground for reversal, and the verdict cannot be held to be against evidence or the weight of evidence.”

T. Allison and D. J. Dean, for appellant. L. Lajlin Kellogg, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Jones & S. 551, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noonan-v-strahan-nysuperctnyc-1887.