Noonan v. State

182 S.W. 1198, 1916 WL 66
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 1916·No. No. 3927·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of sodomy. There is no statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. Nothing is presented which can be reviewed in the absence of these. Therefore the judgment must be affirmed.

DAVIDSON, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noonan v. State, 182 S.W. 1198, 1916 WL 66 (Tex. 1916).

182 S.W. 1198 (Noonan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.