Noonan v. Press Publishing Co.

131 A.D. 891, 115 N.Y.S. 379
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A.D. 891 (Noonan v. Press Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noonan v. Press Publishing Co., 131 A.D. 891, 115 N.Y.S. 379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Wo think that it was a question of fact for the jury whether or not the only reference to be drawn from the article complained of is that the plaintiff was guilty of unchastity. It was error to hold as matter of law that the article, by necessary inference, did so charge. The judgment and order should be [892]*892reversed and a new trial granted, with costs io appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, J J. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noonan v. Press Pub. Co.
121 N.Y.S. 1141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D. 891, 115 N.Y.S. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noonan-v-press-publishing-co-nyappdiv-1909.