Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co.

46 A. 770, 64 N.J.L. 579, 35 Vroom 579, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 134
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is a suit for damages for personal injury received by the plaintiff in collision with a trolley car of defendant company while he was riding, by invitation and without hire, in a carriage owned and driven by Ralph Earle.

The trial j udge nonsuited the plaintiff by imputing to him the negligence of the driver.

This was error, as has been held in Consolidated Traction Co. v. Hoimark, recently decided by this court and reported in 31 Vroom 456. See, also, New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co. v. Steinbrenner, 18 Id. 161.

The judgment below should be reversed.

[580]*580For affirmance—Ludlow. 1.

For reversal—Magie (Chancellor), Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Voorhees. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co., 46 A. 770, 64 N.J.L. 579, 35 Vroom 579, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 134 (N.J. 1900).

46 A. 770 (Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.
79 N.E. 873 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Mumma v. Easton & Amboy Railroad
65 A. 208 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906)
Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. New Jersey Rubber Co.
51 A. 451 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902)
Commercial Assurance Co. v. New Jersey Rubber Co.
49 A. 155 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1901)