Noodelman v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Noodelman v. City of Minneapolis

150 N.W. 398, 128 Minn. 531, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 983

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 15, 1915

DocketNos. 18,957-(184)

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.W. 398 (Noodelman v. City of Minneapolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noodelman v. City of Minneapolis, 150 N.W. 398, 128 Minn. 531, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 983 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under Laws 1913, p. 488, c. 345, any person who is dissatisfied with the amount of damages awarded to him in the condemnation proceedings authorized by said chapter may file with the city clerk, in writing, his objection to the confirmation of the award; and if the award is confirmed he may appeal to the district court. The plaintiff filed this notice with the city clerk:

' “The' undersigned * * * do hereby protest against the award of the commissioners appointed by the said council in the above entitled matter, on the grounds that said award is inadequate.”

Afterwards he gave proper notice of appeal to the district court. The district court dismissed his appeal upon the ground that his notice was insufficient. The notice, while not in the precise form fixed by the statute, sufficiently apprised the council of all that it was requisite that it should know. It was error to dismiss the appeal. ,

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Under Laws 1913, p. 488, c. 345, any person who is dissatisfied with the amount of damages awarded to him in the condemnation proceedings authorized by said chapter may file with the city clerk, in writing, his objection to the confirmation of the award; and if the award is confirmed he may appeal to the district court. The plaintiff filed this notice with the city clerk:

' “The' undersigned * * * do hereby protest against the award of the commissioners appointed by the said council in the above entitled matter, on the grounds that said award is inadequate.”

Afterwards he gave proper notice of appeal to the district court. The district court dismissed his appeal upon the ground that his notice was insufficient. The notice, while not in the precise form fixed by the statute, sufficiently apprised the council of all that it was requisite that it should know. It was error to dismiss the appeal. ,

Order reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.W. 398, 128 Minn. 531, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noodelman-v-city-of-minneapolis-minn-1915.