Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co.

166 Ill. App. 525, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 106

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 22, 1911

DocketGen. No. 16,148

StatusPublished

This text of 166 Ill. App. 525 (Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co., 166 Ill. App. 525, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 106 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error purchased a bill of goods from A. D. Juilliard & Company of New York, and ordered them to be shipped by express, without specifying the name of the company. The goods were delivered to the defendant in error and by it lost in transit. Their undisputed value was $490.12, which amount was paid by the Nonotuck Silk Company to Juilliard'& Company.

The case was tried upon a stipulation of facts and a deposition exactly the same as that in ease No. 16147 between the same parties, excepting as to the description of the goods and their value. (Ante, p. 519.)

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in the case last mentioned, the judgment must- be reversed and a judgment entered here in favor'of the plaintiff in error, Nonotuck Silk Company, and against the defendant in error, Adams Express Company, for $490.12.

Judgment reversed and judgment entered here.

Mr. PresidiNg Justice Baldwin took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI