Nonomme v. State

834 So. 2d 963, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 457, 2003 WL 142683
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
DocketNo. 3D02-2707
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 834 So. 2d 963 (Nonomme v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nonomme v. State, 834 So. 2d 963, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 457, 2003 WL 142683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Contrary to appellant’s assertion, the plea colloquy reveals that the appellant was advised of the immigration consequences of his plea. The order denying the motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franco v. State
897 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 So. 2d 963, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 457, 2003 WL 142683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nonomme-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.